Re: [-empyre-] 2 wr[b]yte

["_dream.thick[ener]_" <netwurker@hotkey.net.au>]

At 07:08 AM 9/10/2005, fwrote:

> 1. Etymologically, "to write" means: to tear, scratch, cut.

_cognition_actions>gestured_n.scriptions_+_[purposeful]balances_

=

_taw[t(h)or]ny_furred poetics.

have.u.ever.seen.crow.poetry?
[masked.in.activity.caw[l]ings]


> Thus "to write"
> points to the basic cut (or the differentiation) that makes a difference,
> that in-forms by creating information, meaning, sense.


_again[st.all.covert.ezy.formulatary]||action_
_differentiation.of.cellular.lvl.text.spawned+jumbled.thru.x.p[oetry.reg]ression.lotteries_

[Insertion of 
Current.Statement.of.Dialogical.M(funeral.meaning).Pyre(s+damaged)N.tent(s)]:

*i.f(t)umble.+.s(addened+black_ball_f(etal)iltered)ojourn.here*
*list.bound(aried.in.a.s.trapped.wurd.straight.jacket*
*a(i)ching.typewritten.mouth(ings).deafmute.stretched.thru.bad.formatting*
*mp_ty.silence.moderat[h]or[goddishly_like].gaps_n.d(e)uce.incomprehensions*

> Or with George
> Spencer Brown: "Draw a distinction, and you create a universe."

_D.Raw[l]ing.torn.bleeding.thru.proactivity>oth[ub]erness.m.braced+m.pathy.ack.no.ledged_


> Thus, when I
> think about 'digital writing' I have to do with a doubled or better: a
> self-referential notion.

_self_rif.f[lings+ego=arrowings]>construction_ripplings_

> Aesthetically, digital writing - for me - is
> concerned with the processes, conditions and potential of writing in its
> pure sense.


processes
conditions
potentionals
*
playfulness>processes.not.tied.with.rubber.conventionality.strings
v[-conditions]>context*context[devote.meandering.minus.a.canons.s(info)tainment]
potentials>sighing.the.good.decency||empathy|\tendency.[silent.texted]smiles


- 
01---------------------------



_intricate mirror mem[e_st]ories_
_ch[str]ained+[D-fence]linked_
http://www.hotkey.net.au/~netwurker/
http://www.livejournal.com/users/netwurker/


                     .